Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Pippi and Harriet
Friday, May 20, 2011
An altar in the house of a Protestant
This is an altar,
an altar in the home of a Protestant.
Go figure.
It started with a book about home altars in New Mexico and the wonderful pictures of personal manifestations of faith. I looked with envy at what my Roman brethren were allowed to have in their homes. They got images of saints and candles. But all I got was the knowledge that my iconoclastic Puritan forefathers were so smug in their empty walls. Well, I like candles, to my Baptist’s great chagrin, and I love the great souls who have shaped my faith. So, why can’t I have an altar? I don’t pray to these images. I don’t beg them for intercession with a Savior who is too far beyond my heart’s reach. No, Christ has made his home in my soul and I can make a Protestant altar if I want to. So what is it that I want?
Always looking backward, hoping to understand clearly, I want a history of my faith. The first image of my shrine is El Tepeyac, the Virgin of Guadalupe.

Down in the cellar of our new house, I found an unused shelf: a 3½-foot piece of heavy pine with plain, Puritan supports. With a thick coat of dark blue paint, gold stars and polyurethane, my altar was ready to put up. (The color and stars come from the ceiling of the Siena duomo, from whence came the great Catherine. But more about her later.) Now, I won’t have you think that my Baptist just accepted the idea of a shrine in the house. He most emphatically did not. And, if my grandmother Dorothy were still alive, besides being 111 years old, she would make some caustic comments about popery. But she is in the arms of her Savior and the Baptist has to love me anyway. With grumbles and grouses, the Baptist mounted the altar, perfectly balanced under the high windows in the kitchen. The Lady fills the space between the windows and for a little while she was the only one up there. My sister gave me a lovely wrought iron hanging candle holder and I keep it filled with tall, 5 day votives. (There is usually a Lady light burning, to guide you through the kitchen if you need the loo in the middle of the night.) But who else would be on the altar? A mess of hard-headed Protestants, that’s who.

So, who are these people? In the central places of honor are my two lodestones of the Protestant Reformation. That thick-necked, bull jawed person on the right is Martin Luther. Painted by his friend, Lucas Cranach the younger, this is the founder of the Protestant Church, warts and all. To his right is his greatest student and theological heartbreak, Philip Melanchthon. This talented lutenist broke with his great teacher over music in church. He also helped to write the Augsburg Confession. Next to Philip is Catherine of Siena. A Roman saint who showed me the road of mysticism and action, I do love her so. On final right is Ulrich Zwingli, primary author of the Augsburg Confession who died at war with other Christians. (Our history is not pretty.)
To Luther’s left, we find Thomas Cranmer, founder of the Anglican Confession, liturgist extraordinaire, true Protestant and martyr. Next to Cranmer is his great contemporary William Tyndale, translator of the Holy Bible and martyr, bless his memory. The sweet image next to him is Teresa of Avila. Like Catherine, she is a lamp to this girl’s feet; if you haven’t read The Interior Castle, you might give it a try. On the ultimate left is John Wesley, who brought the Gospel of Christ to the satanic mills. He was a missionary and true servant of his Lord.
At the lower elevation we find the earlier founders of the faith.



You might notice various crosses scattered around. One came from my father’s last time in Florence, one I inherited from my deeply wonderful mother-in-law and others have come from thither and yon. My friends bring me crosses from their travels. D and K went to the fair Isle of Iona, in the Hebrides, and brought me back a token of that ancient holy place, a small white rock incised with a simple cross. Of such small things great altars are built.
Two altars taught me about the ephemeral nature of shrines. Shrines come out of nowhere, on roadsides or in front of palace gates. And they are in constant flux—a static altar is a dead altar. In the monastery church of S. Florian, in upper Austria, there is a big cork board on a easel, just inside the front door, on the right. This board is covered with photographs of all of the new babies in the congregation. In the sanctuary of Mission San Juan Bautista, just left of the altar rail, there is another cork board, this one filled with pictures of service members. Beautiful young faces in the uniforms of the US Army, Navy and lots of Marines. Both of those cork boards are shrines and always changing
With gifts and acquisitions, the altar in my house is fluid, in my kitchen, the center of the house. The Lady candle is usually lit and the other votives burn bright when friends grace our home. As with all other home shrines, this altar is a statement of faith. It celebrates the great souls who give me strength for the journey. Anyone who comes to our house sees this thing and, to date, it has not offended. In this house there is a whole lot of Mahler, the History of Western Philosophy by Copleston and the Blue Cliff Record. In the house my husband gives me, there is an altar, an altar in the home of an anabaptist Protestant. Go figure.
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
difficult relatives
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
it's been a hard days night
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
RPH #16 “only two things that money can’t buy and that’s true love and homegrown tomatoes”
Monday, November 1, 2010
Kittens
Sunday, August 8, 2010
Take the kids to the museum


RPH #12
take your kids to see the pictures
“Oh, don’t take the baby (2 year old, 5 year old etc. etc.) to the big painting show. They will just cry and bother everyone else.” This, my dear cousins, is a lie. On Tuesday I walked by a dancing 2 1/2 year old standing in a line with her parents. She was letting off some of that endless steam and keeping the people around her entertained. When I saw her again, about an hour later, she had a tiny meltlet (that’s not a real meltdown, just a couple of little squeaks) because she was tired but her daddy held her and she fell asleep on his shoulder. She didn’t bother anyone, she didn’t stand in the way of any painting and she didn’t complain at the size of the crowd. She did manifest one of the important truths of my childhood: take your kid to the museum.
The De Young and the Legion of Honor were cheap days out in the late 1950’s. My father was a cub art teacher at Roosevelt Jr. High, and my mother was at home with two little girls starting elementary school. They had no money; thank God both of them loved to camp, or there wouldn’t have been any vacations. But they had two pretty fine museums and we went. First we went in strollers and then we toddled along with our parents, and we remembered. The first artist I remember liking is Henri Fantin-Latour, because he painted beautiful flowers. This is my point, take your children, grandchildren, cousins and young friends to the museum, they will remember.
This wild imperative is because of the current show at the De Young Museum in Golden Gate Park and that little girl. The Birth of Impressionism: Masterpieces from the Musée D’Orsay is one of the best shows I’ve ever seen and cousins, I’ve seen a lot. Tuesday at noon, our little party walked into the first room, with perfect examples of what the French Academy wanted in the middle of the 19th century. There was the luscious and perfectly composed “Birth of Venus.”— a large canvas (7’ x 3 1/2’?) on a classical (Greek or Roman) subject, perfectly rendered and very cool. (No matter how beautiful the nudes, male or female, they are removed from the observer.) These are the paintings that the Academy accepted. They honored, they celebrated but they did not move, not even the perfectly proportioned “Madonna of Solace” which shows a distraught mother draped over the lap of the Virgin and the baby, dead, at the feet of the Mother of God. The infant’s grayish, porcelain body is perfect in death and the mother’s aspect is genteel grief. This picture is what I don’t like about the French Academy of the middle 19th century.
The genius of this show is the time it takes to tell its story. We don’t leap from the cold perfection of the Academics to Cezane. The tale unfolds from Corot and Breton to James McNeill Whistler. You think you know “Arrangement #1 in Grey and Black: portrait of the artist’s mother” but it is a revelation. On the cusp between the formalism of the Academy and looking forward to what will come, Whistler’s “Mother” is totally involving and worth the whole price of admission.
