Thursday, March 18, 2010

The Troubles

RpH #8
the Troubles

The first time I remember wearing orange on St. Patrick’s day was in first grade. We were going up the stairs to the classroom and a classmate said I wasn’t wearing green. But my dress was of a small, floral pattern that had both colors in it, so no pinching occurred that day. My father, who did not go to church, taught me always to wear orange on the Irish national saint’s day. Sometimes it was as simple as orange crepe paper around my arm and for a while I wore orange with black, for sorrow. But always orange on St. Patrick’s Day, because, Daddy said, I am a Protestant.
Ireland is a mother of nations, a large island in the Atlantic ocean that has sent her sons and daughters all over the world, looking for food and work. The Irish were occupied by the English for hundreds of years, their language was outlawed, their church was suppressed and their land was given to Protestant Scottish farmers. The sorrow of Ireland is known, sung and fought, but what the hell does it have to do with me?
My paternal great grandfather was Mathias Gibson, a poor lad with bad lungs who came from Belfast. He ended up in New Hampshire, married Clara Hubble and fathered Dorothy Viola, my father’s mother. Dorothy didn’t care about the Irish connection except to refer to the Kennedy Clan as “lace curtain” Irish. She was a lifelong Republican who grew up in Boston. Family legend holds that Mathias would put an orange ribbon in his lapel and “go down to Southy on St. Patrick’s Day to discuss fine points of theology with his Catholic brethren.” So I was a Protestant before I confessed Christ, a political distinction but harmless.
Then, in 1972, the marches and riots of Bloody Sunday were spread over the news and Protestant and Catholic became very real words. Although a child of the Vietnam War, I was still in the cozy world of political black and white. As a high school drama queen, I was drawn to the poor benighted Protestants of Northern Ireland, only to be slapped in the face with a long ugly history and very complicated politics.
There was Ian Paisley, (Paisley, a town outside Glasgow in the Western Highlands of Scotland from whence his forefathers came) in clerical collar and always with pectoral cross, yelling about how the Catholics had to be controlled or they would enslave the world. And Gerry Adams, talking normal as milk, the representative of Sinn Fein, but in the beginning he was the mouthpiece for the provisional IRA, as narrow-minded and violent as the Ulster Unionist Party. He also scared the British so much that the BBC was not allowed to broadcast Adams’ voice. Both parties were blinded by their individual visions of national victimhood. In between were a disenfranchised Catholic minority and a brainwashed Protestant majority. The complaints were centuries old and, it appeared, intractable.
The most telling story for me was a little vignette that was played out across a no-go zone in Derry. Two boys were throwing rocks at each other, after their day together at school. So Michael yells over to Sean, “Sean, that’s me ma. I’ve got to go in for me tea. See ya tomorrow.” There was the soul of the Troubles , stubborn boys throwing rocks at each other because that was what they were taught to do. Those rocks were bombs and made the five counties of Northern Ireland a very dark and bloody ground. The Troubles of Northern Ireland were my political education. The victims were preyed upon by para-military thugs on both sides, no perfect good or bad. And I also learned to be ashamed of some Protestant voices. Ian Paisley prepared me for Pat Robertson.
  And I learned that even the most entrenched conflicts can be undone. In 1989 the impenetrable Wall came down in Berlin and Germany was unified. For a small time the undoable seemed doable. But that wall was only 50 years old; nothing could possibly be done about the 350 year old sorrow of Northern Ireland—unless, of course, the enabling power, Great Britain, had finally had enough. When it was no longer supportable for Britain to be in Northern Ireland, then Britain chose to leave, with its Protestant supporting army. But how? How could the earliest sins of the Empire be undone?
  Out of the Pine Tree State of Maine came George Mitchell, a retired American senator and the complete honest broker. Using the quiet and implacable negotiating techniques he honed in the Senate of the United States, Mitchell did the impossible and forged the Good Friday accords. Now, almost ten years later, the British Army is leaving Northern Ireland and there is a Target store in Belfast.
  Terrible sorrows can end, the sins of empire can be overcome and hope can prevail. All that needs done is the impossible, and that only takes the belief it can happen. The North is turning into a normal place and I can pray, with all honesty, for a untied Ireland.

 Erin Go Bragh.

Saturday, March 13, 2010

that boy, those tigers

RpH #7

that boy, those tigers

What we see is what we know. First impressions are the engine of romance and mystery, and some history too. Just try to undo your first impression of an historical figure. Because of our first impressions, we recoil when we find out that Jefferson had a black bed slave and that FDR knew about the death camps and did nothing. I fell in love with Thomas More when I was 13 because he was Paul Scofield, with that perfect ruined face and endless voice. When I finally read More, I found a narrow minded pedant who didn’t want me to read the Gospels because he thought I wouldn’t understand them correctly.

In the realm of children’s picture books, image is everything and every picture tells a story. Pictures give us Madeline and Curious George and Gold Bug and everything else. In Goodnight Gorilla, Peggy Rathman tells us the entire story in pictures and the story is complete. But what happens when a great story is ruined by really bad pictures? I speak of The Story of Little Black Sambo by Helen Bannerman, first published in 1899, the boy and the tigers.

Little Black Sambo, the very words make us cringe. The pictures from this book were used for at least 75 years to demean, denigrate and defame African Americans in particular and Africans in general. This is because the defamers didn’t spend the time to read the book. Point the first, Sambo is not from the mother continent of the human race, Africa, but from South India. The Imperial Brits, in their colonial madness, called anyone who could handle more than ten minutes in the full sun without suffering second degree burns a black. Point the second, Sambo, Mumbo and Jumbo are all smart. Mumbo runs a tight, thrifty household and she can handle the sudden appearance of a large amount of tiger ghee. Jumbo is so smart and hard working that he can afford to kit his son out in the latest style, that perfect green umbrella, those perfect red slippers and all the rest. Jumbo is also very resourceful, always traveling with great copper pots, ideal to collect anything of value that might come along, including tiger ghee. And then there is Sambo his own self.

There he is, walking down the road in the finery that his mother’s thriftiness and his father’s acumen have produced. Sambo is fearless and quick of wit. He loves the beautiful things he’s been given but he knows what matters—he has to come home alive. So he bribes the truly deadly and really stupid tigers and gets home with his skin intact. Jumbo collects the ghee, Mumbo cooks the pancakes and both are very proud of their brilliant boy. So what is not to like in this story? THE PICTURES.

The original pictures are dreadful, racist and badly drawn. How dow do we tease this good story away from really bad pictures? Simple, make new pictures. In 2007 an edition of Bannerman’s story was published with new illustrations and it made all the difference. Set in South India, Christopher Bing paints a beautiful and lush landscape to aid the rebirth of Bannerman’s words. Jumbo is tall and handsome and Mumbo is resplendent in a sari of orange and red. Sambo is a good looking boy with the sly eyes of trickster who can outwit tigers. Change the pictures and you can regain the story; all it takes is a new look through new eyes. Bing’s gorgeous illustrations of Bannerman’s story resurrects it for new readers. The first impression will change and someday, no one will remember that Sambo was a terrible insult. They will just think of a terrific story about a very smart boy and some very vain tigers.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

what shall I read to my child?

RPH #3
read, read what shall I read to my child

I love selling books. It fulfills the two great desires in my black heart: to advise and to help. Although connected these are separate impulses. When my customers accept advice, it suggests that they think I might know something. When I can help them, it implies power. Guidance and power are a wonderful combination. But there is one more element that entices me to life as a bookseller: picture books.
Adult books, fiction in especial, don’t have pictures. Neither do the young adult novels, filled as they are with swooning teen vampire hunters. But when the reading life begins, illustration is the support of story. Beautifully drawn images draw the eye and through the eye, the mind. Not, mind you, the edgy monochromes that some publishers use to attract young hip parents; yes, the parents have to read the books, but they are not the audience. The person in the lap is the audience, and that person wants clear images with bright, contrasting colors, you know, like, Disney, Berenstain Bears or Dora.
Scooby Doo, Spider Man, Fancy Nancy and all the other character-driven 8”x8” tomes rule your life. You read them in the store and, when you buy them, you read them at home. You buy them because you ask your beautiful and brilliant 2–5 year olds what they want. Please forgive me if I sound shrill, but WHAT ARE YOU THINKING? You don’t ask that brilliant child if she wants to eat or if he wants a sweater or to go to the doctor. You don’t even ask your child if she wants to go to bed. No, you are the parent and, in all other ways, you take excellent care of your perfect child. It is only literature where you hand your adult wisdom over to the wild and easily influenced whims of your small, illiterate child. Dear Folks, they don’t know what they want. Why do this to yourselves?
I have not come here to berate you but to put you in your proper place. You are the mommie/daddie, you alone know what is best for your small folk. They will like what you like and, even if they don’t right now, they will soon. You are the source of all that is good and true; whatever you read to them will be what they want. So, you get to decide what is read at bedtime. It might be old stories like Blueberries for Sal or new wonders like The Library Lion and Niccolini’s Song. These and hundreds like them will make for deeply desired bedtime reading and they won’t rot your parental brain when you read them for the 100th time. But, asks the reasonable parent, how do I know what’s good and what ain’t? Well . . .
That’s me, that short, ball shaped grey haired woman, sitting on a step stool and sorting the 8”x8”s. I read the catalogues and the reviews because you don’t have time. The publishers send me galleys so I’ll flog their latest book. In other stores and other towns, I look different but, at heart, I’m a kids’ bookseller. Take advantage of my knowledge of children’s liturature and I’ll tell you the truth. Although I will sell you any book you ask for, I will never lie to you. And I am dedicated to your child wanting to read, almost as much as you are. Just ask me what you want and I’ll give you what you need.